PairBook
HomeCNTN › CNTN vs TWIN

CNTN vs TWIN: Correlation

Canton Strategic Holdings, Inc. (CNTN) and Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.36.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.36
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
-0.03
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.23
long-run
Ann. covariance
3362.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CNTN and TWIN?

On 3 years of weekly data the CNTN/TWIN correlation comes out at 0.36, moderate. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.03 versus 0.36 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is 0.23, and annualized covariance runs at 3362.5 %².

By 3-year correlation, TWIN places #4 of the 11 assets tracked against CNTN. The last year tells two different stories: TWIN led by 138.8 percentage points, -52.6% for CNTN against +86.2% for TWIN. One caveat on sizing: CNTN is 3.6 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CNTN vs TWIN: side by side

CNTN (Canton Strategic Holdings, Inc.)TWIN (Twin Disc, Incorporated)
1-year return-52.6%+86.2%
5-year return-99.8%+98.7%
Volatility (ann.)182.3%50.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.520.83
Max drawdown (3Y)-99.0%-64.4%
Market cap$0.2B$0.3B
P/E (trailing)12.6
Dividend yield0.00%0.68%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: TWIN 0.68% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: TWIN -64.4% vs -99.0%Higher 5y return: TWIN +98.7% vs -99.8%
-49%0%+90%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CNTN · TWIN

Year-by-year returns

YearCNTNTWIN
2022-11.3%
2023-94.8%+66.7%
2024-73.4%-26.4%
2025+49.3%+44.4%
2026-22.4%+41.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CNTN and TWIN good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.36, CNTN and TWIN keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CNTN and TWIN?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CNTN and TWIN is 0.36 over 3 years, -0.03 over 1 year and 0.23 over 5 years.

Is TWIN a good diversifier for CNTN?

Reasonably. At 0.36, CNTN and TWIN keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.36 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cntn-vs-twin.json

CNTN vs TWIN: 3-year weekly correlation 0.36CNTN vs TWIN0.36

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CNTN vs TWIN correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cntn-vs-twin.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cntn-vs-twin/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CNTN correlations · TWIN correlations