PairBook
HomeCNO › CNO vs UZX

CNO vs UZX: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, CNO Financial Group, Inc. (CNO) and Linkage Global Inc - Class A (UZX) carry a correlation of -0.25, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.25
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.24
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-777.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CNO and UZX?

On 3 years of weekly data the CNO/UZX correlation comes out at -0.25, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.24 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -777.4 %².

Among the 25 assets we track against CNO, UZX sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #23. The last year tells two different stories: CNO led by 136.2 percentage points, +41.6% for CNO against -94.6% for UZX. One caveat on sizing: UZX is 6.1 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CNO vs UZX: side by side

CNO (CNO Financial Group, Inc.)UZX (Linkage Global Inc - Class A)
1-year return+41.6%-94.6%
5-year return+150.0%n/a
Volatility (ann.)22.5%137.7%
Beta vs S&P 5000.690.09
Max drawdown (3Y)-15.9%-99.8%
Market cap$5.1B
P/E (trailing)18.9
Dividend yield1.26%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: CNO 1.26% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: CNO -15.9% vs -99.8%
-95%0%+41%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CNO · UZX

Year-by-year returns

YearCNOUZX
2022-1.6%
2023+25.1%
2024+36.1%-71.7%
2025+16.1%-58.8%
2026+30.9%-93.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CNO and UZX good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.25 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CNO and UZX?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CNO and UZX is -0.25 over 3 years, -0.24 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is UZX a good diversifier for CNO?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.25 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cno-vs-uzx.json

CNO vs UZX: 3-year weekly correlation -0.25CNO vs UZX-0.25

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CNO vs UZX correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cno-vs-uzx.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cno-vs-uzx/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CNO correlations · UZX correlations