PairBook
HomeCNC › CNC vs MRAM

CNC vs MRAM: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Centene Corporation (CNC) and Everspin Technologies, Inc. (MRAM) carry a correlation of 0.30, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.30
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.47
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.27
long-run
Ann. covariance
933.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CNC and MRAM?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CNC and MRAM correlate at 0.30, moderate. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.47) than the 3-year average (0.30). Stretching to 5 years gives 0.27, with an annualized covariance of 933.1 %².

Within CNC's tracked universe of 30 assets, MRAM comes in at #10 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months MRAM outperformed by 46.7 percentage points (+126.5% for CNC against +173.2% for MRAM). One caveat on sizing: MRAM is 1.5 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CNC vs MRAM: side by side

CNC (Centene Corporation)MRAM (Everspin Technologies, Inc.)
1-year return+126.5%+173.2%
5-year return+3.3%+134.7%
Volatility (ann.)45.4%69.5%
Beta vs S&P 5000.361.58
Max drawdown (3Y)-68.6%-70.6%
Market cap$32.3B$0.4B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryHealth CareUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: CNC -68.6% vs -70.6%Higher 5y return: MRAM +134.7% vs +3.3%
0%+477%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CNC · MRAM

Year-by-year returns

YearCNCMRAM
2022-0.5%-50.8%
2023-9.5%+62.6%
2024-18.4%-29.3%
2025-32.1%+45.2%
2026+58.8%+88.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CNC and MRAM good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.30 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CNC and MRAM?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CNC and MRAM is 0.30 over 3 years, 0.47 over 1 year and 0.27 over 5 years.

Is MRAM a good diversifier for CNC?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.30 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.30 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cnc-vs-mram.json

CNC vs MRAM: 3-year weekly correlation 0.30CNC vs MRAM0.30

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CNC vs MRAM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cnc-vs-mram.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cnc-vs-mram/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CNC correlations · MRAM correlations