PairBook
HomeCNC › CNC vs MPU

CNC vs MPU: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Centene Corporation (CNC) and Mega Matrix Inc. Class A (MPU) carry a correlation of -0.29, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.29
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.11
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.18
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1799.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CNC and MPU?

On 3 years of weekly data the CNC/MPU correlation comes out at -0.29, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.11) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.29). The 5-year figure is -0.18, and annualized covariance runs at -1799.1 %².

Among the 30 assets we track against CNC, MPU sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #28. The last year tells two different stories: CNC led by 217.8 percentage points, +126.5% for CNC against -91.3% for MPU. One caveat on sizing: MPU is 3.0 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CNC vs MPU: side by side

CNC (Centene Corporation)MPU (Mega Matrix Inc. Class A)
1-year return+126.5%-91.3%
5-year return+3.3%-96.8%
Volatility (ann.)45.4%137.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.361.05
Max drawdown (3Y)-68.6%-95.1%
Market cap$32.3B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryHealth CareUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: CNC -68.6% vs -95.1%Higher 5y return: CNC +3.3% vs -96.8%
-89%0%+134%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CNC · MPU

Year-by-year returns

YearCNCMPU
2022-0.5%-85.3%
2023-9.5%-19.9%
2024-18.4%-1.4%
2025-32.1%-34.5%
2026+58.8%-75.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CNC and MPU good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.29, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CNC and MPU?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CNC and MPU is -0.29 over 3 years, 0.11 over 1 year and -0.18 over 5 years.

Is MPU a good diversifier for CNC?

Yes: at -0.29, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.29 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.29 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cnc-vs-mpu.json

CNC vs MPU: 3-year weekly correlation -0.29CNC vs MPU-0.29

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CNC vs MPU correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cnc-vs-mpu.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cnc-vs-mpu/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CNC correlations · MPU correlations