PairBook
HomeCNA › CNA vs TRV

CNA vs TRV: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) and Travelers Companies (The) (TRV) carry a correlation of 0.63, a strong link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.63
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.68
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.65
long-run
Ann. covariance
259.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CNA and TRV?

On 3 years of weekly data the CNA/TRV correlation comes out at 0.63, strong. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.68 over 1 year against 0.63 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.65, and annualized covariance runs at 259.6 %².

By 3-year correlation, TRV places #8 of the 26 assets tracked against CNA. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months TRV outperformed by 30.2 percentage points (+7.6% for CNA against +37.8% for TRV).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CNA vs TRV: side by side

CNA (CNA Financial Corporation)TRV (Travelers Companies (The))
1-year return+7.6%+37.8%
5-year return+64.0%+155.3%
Volatility (ann.)19.8%20.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.210.36
Max drawdown (3Y)-14.6%-12.5%
Market cap$13.2B$77.0B
P/E (trailing)10.910.0
Dividend yield3.80%1.23%
Sector / categoryUS ListedFinancials
Lower P/E: TRV 10.0 vs 10.9Higher yield: CNA 3.80% vs 1.23%Smaller drawdown: TRV -12.5% vs -14.6%Higher 5y return: TRV +155.3% vs +64.0%
-7%0%+43%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CNA · TRV

Year-by-year returns

YearCNATRV
2022+3.8%+22.4%
2023+7.1%+3.9%
2024+24.0%+28.8%
2025+7.0%+22.4%
2026+10.1%+28.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CNA and TRV good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.63 means CNA and TRV share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CNA and TRV?

The CNA/TRV correlation stands at 0.63 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.68, 5 years: 0.65), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is TRV a good diversifier for CNA?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.63 means CNA and TRV share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.63 mean?

A reading of 0.63 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cna-vs-trv.json

CNA vs TRV: 3-year weekly correlation 0.63CNA vs TRV0.63

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CNA vs TRV correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cna-vs-trv.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cna-vs-trv/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CNA correlations · TRV correlations