PairBook
HomeCMND › CMND vs MI

CMND vs MI: Correlation

Clearmind Medicine Inc. (CMND) and NFT Limited Class A (MI) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.25.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.25
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.33
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.21
long-run
Ann. covariance
-135699.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CMND and MI?

On 3 years of weekly data the CMND/MI correlation comes out at -0.25, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.33 over 1 year against -0.25 over 3. The 5-year figure is -0.21, and annualized covariance runs at -135699.7 %².

MI is close to the least connected end of CMND's tracked universe, ranking #9 of 10. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months MI outperformed by 89.3 percentage points (-99.6% for CMND against -10.3% for MI). Note the risk asymmetry: MI runs 36.3 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CMND vs MI: side by side

CMND (Clearmind Medicine Inc.)MI (NFT Limited Class A)
1-year return-99.6%-10.3%
5-year returnn/a-99.5%
Volatility (ann.)122.3%4443.9%
Beta vs S&P 5001.248.21
Max drawdown (3Y)-100.0%-98.5%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: MI -98.5% vs -100.0%
-100%0%+384%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CMND · MI

Year-by-year returns

YearCMNDMI
2022-86.4%
2023-97.0%-66.2%
2024-50.9%-61.9%
2025-96.7%+13.3%
2026-90.0%-28.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CMND and MI good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.25 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CMND and MI?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CMND and MI is -0.25 over 3 years, -0.33 over 1 year and -0.21 over 5 years.

Is MI a good diversifier for CMND?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.25 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cmnd-vs-mi.json

CMND vs MI: 3-year weekly correlation -0.25CMND vs MI-0.25

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CMND vs MI correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cmnd-vs-mi.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cmnd-vs-mi/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CMND correlations · MI correlations