CMG vs INTS: Correlation
How closely do Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) and Intensity Therapeutics, Inc. (INTS) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.25, which is negative.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CMG and INTS?
Over the past 3 years, CMG and INTS moved with a correlation of -0.25, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.42) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.25). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -1551.2 %².
Among the 36 assets we track against CMG, INTS sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #32. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with CMG ahead by 30.7 points (-12.7% versus -43.4%). Note the risk asymmetry: INTS runs 4.8 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CMG vs INTS: side by side
| CMG (Chipotle Mexican Grill) | INTS (Intensity Therapeutics, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -12.7% | -43.4% |
| 5-year return | -2.9% | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 35.7% | 173.1% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.89 | 0.52 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -58.9% | -98.5% |
| Market cap | $47.1B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 34.5 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | Consumer Discretionary | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CMG | INTS |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -20.6% | – |
| 2023 | +64.8% | – |
| 2024 | +31.8% | -79.5% |
| 2025 | -38.6% | -76.7% |
| 2026 | +0.6% | -58.3% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CMG and INTS good diversifiers for each other?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.25, CMG and INTS have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CMG and INTS?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.25 over 3 years, with -0.42 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.
Is INTS a good diversifier for CMG?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.25, CMG and INTS have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.25 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cmg-vs-ints.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cmg-vs-ints/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CMG correlations · INTS correlations
