PairBook
HomeCMG › CMG vs DUK

CMG vs DUK: Correlation

Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) and Duke Energy (DUK) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.19.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.19
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.21
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.02
long-run
Ann. covariance
-107.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CMG and DUK?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CMG and DUK correlate at -0.19, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.21 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.02, with an annualized covariance of -107.5 %².

Among the 36 assets we track against CMG, DUK ranks #26 by 3-year correlation. The trailing year gives DUK the advantage: -12.7% versus +1.1%, a 13.8-point spread. On a rolling one-year basis the correlation drifted between -0.27 and 0.12, a moderate band. Note the risk asymmetry: CMG runs 2.2 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
Rolling one-year correlation of weekly returns over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CMG vs DUK: side by side

CMG (Chipotle Mexican Grill)DUK (Duke Energy)
1-year return-12.7%+1.1%
5-year return-2.9%+39.8%
Volatility (ann.)35.7%15.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.89-0.09
Max drawdown (3Y)-58.9%-11.6%
Market cap$47.1B$94.2B
P/E (trailing)34.518.3
Dividend yield0.00%3.49%
Sector / categoryConsumer DiscretionaryUtilities
Lower P/E: DUK 18.3 vs 34.5Higher yield: DUK 3.49% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: DUK -11.6% vs -58.9%Higher 5y return: DUK +39.8% vs -2.9%
-28%0%+12%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CMG · DUK

Year-by-year returns

YearCMGDUK
2022-20.6%+2.0%
2023+64.8%-1.6%
2024+31.8%+15.6%
2025-38.6%+12.7%
2026+0.6%+5.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CMG and DUK good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CMG and DUK?

The CMG/DUK correlation stands at -0.19 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.21, 5 years: -0.02), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is DUK a good diversifier for CMG?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.19 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cmg-vs-duk.json

CMG vs DUK: 3-year weekly correlation -0.19CMG vs DUK-0.19

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CMG vs DUK correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cmg-vs-duk.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cmg-vs-duk/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CMG correlations · DUK correlations