PairBook
HomeCMCT › CMCT vs FRT

CMCT vs FRT: Correlation

Creative Media (CMCT) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.19.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.19
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.05
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.11
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1114.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CMCT and FRT?

On 3 years of weekly data the CMCT/FRT correlation comes out at -0.19, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.05) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.19). The 5-year figure is -0.11, and annualized covariance runs at -1114.7 %².

Among the 25 assets we track against CMCT, FRT ranks #16 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months FRT outperformed by 121.0 percentage points (-99.4% for CMCT against +21.6% for FRT). Note the risk asymmetry: CMCT runs 15.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CMCT vs FRT: side by side

CMCT (Creative Media)FRT (Federal Realty Investment Trust)
1-year return-99.4%+21.6%
5-year return-100.0%+18.8%
Volatility (ann.)305.8%19.5%
Beta vs S&P 5001.220.53
Max drawdown (3Y)-100.0%-27.4%
Market cap$10.2B
P/E (trailing)23.6
Dividend yield0.00%3.84%
Sector / categoryUS ListedReal Estate
Higher yield: FRT 3.84% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: FRT -27.4% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: FRT +18.8% vs -100.0%
-100%0%+31%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CMCT · FRT

Year-by-year returns

YearCMCTFRT
2022-29.7%-22.7%
2023-18.2%+6.6%
2024-93.3%+12.1%
2025-35.5%-5.9%
2026-98.9%+19.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CMCT and FRT good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.19, CMCT and FRT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CMCT and FRT?

The CMCT/FRT correlation stands at -0.19 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.05, 5 years: -0.11), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is FRT a good diversifier for CMCT?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.19, CMCT and FRT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?

A reading of -0.19 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cmct-vs-frt.json

CMCT vs FRT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.19CMCT vs FRT-0.19

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CMCT vs FRT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cmct-vs-frt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cmct-vs-frt/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CMCT correlations · FRT correlations