PairBook
HomeCMCSA › CMCSA vs ZSQR

CMCSA vs ZSQR: Correlation

How closely do Comcast (CMCSA) and Z Squared Inc. (ZSQR) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.21, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.21
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.23
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.08
long-run
Ann. covariance
-486.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CMCSA and ZSQR?

On 3 years of weekly data the CMCSA/ZSQR correlation comes out at -0.21, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.23) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.08, and annualized covariance runs at -486.3 %².

Among the 39 assets we track against CMCSA, ZSQR sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #35. The last year tells two different stories: CMCSA led by 55.6 percentage points, -12.6% for CMCSA against -68.2% for ZSQR. Note the risk asymmetry: ZSQR runs 4.1 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CMCSA vs ZSQR: side by side

CMCSA (Comcast)ZSQR (Z Squared Inc.)
1-year return-12.6%-68.2%
5-year return-44.5%-97.9%
Volatility (ann.)23.8%98.5%
Beta vs S&P 5000.480.28
Max drawdown (3Y)-44.9%-89.7%
Market cap$93.7B$0.2B
P/E (trailing)8.7
Dividend yield4.85%0.00%
Sector / categoryCommunication ServicesUS Listed
Higher yield: CMCSA 4.85% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: CMCSA -44.9% vs -89.7%Higher 5y return: CMCSA -44.5% vs -97.9%
-70%0%+53%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CMCSA · ZSQR

Year-by-year returns

YearCMCSAZSQR
2022-28.7%-84.7%
2023+29.1%-48.8%
2024-11.8%-64.9%
2025-17.3%+159.1%
2026-2.2%-70.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CMCSA and ZSQR good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.21, CMCSA and ZSQR have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CMCSA and ZSQR?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CMCSA and ZSQR is -0.21 over 3 years, -0.23 over 1 year and -0.08 over 5 years.

Is ZSQR a good diversifier for CMCSA?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.21, CMCSA and ZSQR have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cmcsa-vs-zsqr.json

CMCSA vs ZSQR: 3-year weekly correlation -0.21CMCSA vs ZSQR-0.21

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CMCSA vs ZSQR correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cmcsa-vs-zsqr.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cmcsa-vs-zsqr/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CMCSA correlations · ZSQR correlations