PairBook
HomeCMCSA › CMCSA vs SMHB

CMCSA vs SMHB: Correlation

How closely do Comcast (CMCSA) and ETRACS Monthly Pay 2x Leveraged Small Cap High Dividend ETN (SMHB) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.47, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.47
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.38
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.53
long-run
Ann. covariance
440.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CMCSA and SMHB?

On 3 years of weekly data the CMCSA/SMHB correlation comes out at 0.47, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.38 over 1 year against 0.47 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.53, and annualized covariance runs at 440.4 %².

Among the 39 assets we track against CMCSA, SMHB ranks #10 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with SMHB ahead by 20.0 points (-12.6% versus +7.4%). One caveat on sizing: SMHB is 1.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CMCSA vs SMHB: side by side

CMCSA (Comcast)SMHB (ETRACS Monthly Pay 2x Leveraged Small Cap High Dividend ETN)
1-year return-12.6%+7.4%
5-year return-44.5%-13.5%
Volatility (ann.)23.8%39.3%
Beta vs S&P 5000.481.42
Max drawdown (3Y)-44.9%-45.0%
Market cap$93.7B
P/E (trailing)8.7
Dividend yield4.85%
Sector / categoryCommunication ServicesUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: CMCSA -44.9% vs -45.0%Higher 5y return: SMHB -13.5% vs -44.5%
-27%0%+6%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CMCSA · SMHB

Year-by-year returns

YearCMCSASMHB
2022-28.7%-36.0%
2023+29.1%+36.0%
2024-11.8%-15.8%
2025-17.3%-7.7%
2026-2.2%+22.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CMCSA and SMHB good diversifiers for each other?

A fair diversifier. At 0.47, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CMCSA and SMHB?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.47 over 3 years, with 0.38 over the last year and 0.53 over 5 years.

Is SMHB a good diversifier for CMCSA?

A fair diversifier. At 0.47, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

What does a correlation of 0.47 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cmcsa-vs-smhb.json

CMCSA vs SMHB: 3-year weekly correlation 0.47CMCSA vs SMHB0.47

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CMCSA vs SMHB correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cmcsa-vs-smhb.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cmcsa-vs-smhb/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CMCSA correlations · SMHB correlations