CMCSA vs KIM: Correlation
How closely do Comcast (CMCSA) and Kimco Realty (KIM) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.47, which is moderate.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CMCSA and KIM?
Over the past 3 years, CMCSA and KIM moved with a correlation of 0.47, which is moderate. The past 12 months show a weaker link (0.33) than the 3-year average (0.47). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.46, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 255.9 %².
By 3-year correlation, KIM places #9 of the 39 assets tracked against CMCSA. The last year tells two different stories: KIM led by 24.0 percentage points, -12.6% for CMCSA against +11.4% for KIM. Stability stands out here, with the rolling one-year correlation confined to 0.37 through 0.60.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CMCSA vs KIM: side by side
| CMCSA (Comcast) | KIM (Kimco Realty) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -12.6% | +11.4% |
| 5-year return | -44.5% | +35.9% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 23.8% | 22.9% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.48 | 0.63 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -44.9% | -25.9% |
| Market cap | $93.7B | $16.0B |
| P/E (trailing) | 8.7 | 28.0 |
| Dividend yield | 4.85% | 4.29% |
| Sector / category | Communication Services | Real Estate |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CMCSA | KIM |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -28.7% | -10.8% |
| 2023 | +29.1% | +6.1% |
| 2024 | -11.8% | +15.0% |
| 2025 | -17.3% | -9.3% |
| 2026 | -2.2% | +20.1% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CMCSA and KIM good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.47, CMCSA and KIM keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CMCSA and KIM?
The CMCSA/KIM correlation stands at 0.47 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.33, 5 years: 0.46), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is KIM a good diversifier for CMCSA?
Reasonably. At 0.47, CMCSA and KIM keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.47 mean?
A reading of 0.47 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cmcsa-vs-kim.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cmcsa-vs-kim/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CMCSA correlations · KIM correlations
