PairBook
HomeCMCSA › CMCSA vs GITS

CMCSA vs GITS: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Comcast (CMCSA) and Global Interactive Technologies, Inc. (GITS) carry a correlation of -0.22, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.19
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-6974.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CMCSA and GITS?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CMCSA and GITS correlate at -0.22, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.19) than the 3-year average (-0.22). Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -6974.3 %².

Among the 39 assets we track against CMCSA, GITS sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #37. The trailing year gives CMCSA the advantage: -12.6% versus -22.1%, a 9.5-point spread. One caveat on sizing: GITS is 56.8 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CMCSA vs GITS: side by side

CMCSA (Comcast)GITS (Global Interactive Technologies, Inc.)
1-year return-12.6%-22.1%
5-year return-44.5%n/a
Volatility (ann.)23.8%1352.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.48-3.91
Max drawdown (3Y)-44.9%-98.4%
Market cap$93.7B
P/E (trailing)8.7
Dividend yield4.85%0.00%
Sector / categoryCommunication ServicesUS Listed
Higher yield: CMCSA 4.85% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: CMCSA -44.9% vs -98.4%
-65%0%+86%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CMCSA · GITS

Year-by-year returns

YearCMCSAGITS
2022-28.7%
2023+29.1%
2024-11.8%-69.5%
2025-17.3%+186.6%
2026-2.2%+154.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CMCSA and GITS good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.22, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CMCSA and GITS?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.22 over 3 years, with 0.19 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.

Is GITS a good diversifier for CMCSA?

Yes: at -0.22, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.22 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cmcsa-vs-gits.json

CMCSA vs GITS: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22CMCSA vs GITS-0.22

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CMCSA vs GITS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cmcsa-vs-gits.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cmcsa-vs-gits/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CMCSA correlations · GITS correlations