PairBook
HomeCM › CM vs QQQ

CM vs QQQ: Correlation

How closely do Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) and Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.32, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.32
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.29
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.42
long-run
Ann. covariance
120.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CM and QQQ?

On 3 years of weekly data the CM/QQQ correlation comes out at 0.32, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.29 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.42, and annualized covariance runs at 120.6 %².

QQQ is close to the least connected end of CM's tracked universe, ranking #7 of 10. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with CM ahead by 28.5 points (+54.8% versus +26.3%).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CM vs QQQ: side by side

CM (Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce)QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust)
1-year return+54.8%+26.3%
5-year return+145.1%+95.4%
Volatility (ann.)19.2%19.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.571.28
Max drawdown (3Y)-17.4%-22.8%
Market cap$104.3B
P/E (trailing)16.2
Dividend yield0.00%0.44%
Expense ratio0.18%
Assets under management$452.8B
Sector / categoryUS ListedETF · US Growth & Tech
Higher yield: QQQ 0.44% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: CM -17.4% vs -22.8%Higher 5y return: CM +145.1% vs +95.4%

QQQ is a Large Growth fund from Invesco: $452.8B under management, 104 holdings, a 0.18% expense ratio, a 0.44% trailing dividend yield.

-2%0%+60%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CM · QQQ

Year-by-year returns

YearCMQQQ
2022-26.8%-32.6%
2023+26.5%+54.9%
2024+37.8%+25.6%
2025+46.5%+20.8%
2026+28.6%+17.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CM and QQQ good diversifiers for each other?

A fair diversifier. At 0.32, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CM and QQQ?

The CM/QQQ correlation stands at 0.32 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.29, 5 years: 0.42), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is QQQ a good diversifier for CM?

A fair diversifier. At 0.32, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

What does a correlation of 0.32 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cm-vs-qqq.json

CM vs QQQ: 3-year weekly correlation 0.32CM vs QQQ0.32

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CM vs QQQ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cm-vs-qqq.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cm-vs-qqq/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CM correlations · QQQ correlations