PairBook
HomeCLH › CLH vs MNOV

CLH vs MNOV: Correlation

Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) and MediciNova, Inc. (MNOV) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.24.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.42
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.13
long-run
Ann. covariance
-323.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CLH and MNOV?

Over the past 3 years, CLH and MNOV moved with a correlation of -0.24, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.42 versus -0.24 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.13, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -323.1 %².

Out of 17 assets tracked against CLH, MNOV lands near the bottom at #14. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with CLH ahead by 21.0 points (+27.0% versus +6.0%). Note the risk asymmetry: MNOV runs 2.4 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CLH vs MNOV: side by side

CLH (Clean Harbors, Inc.)MNOV (MediciNova, Inc.)
1-year return+27.0%+6.0%
5-year return+204.2%-62.8%
Volatility (ann.)23.8%57.3%
Beta vs S&P 5000.660.17
Max drawdown (3Y)-30.9%-53.7%
Market cap$16.5B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)37.8
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: CLH -30.9% vs -53.7%Higher 5y return: CLH +204.2% vs -62.8%
-13%0%+44%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CLH · MNOV

Year-by-year returns

YearCLHMNOV
2022+14.4%-23.5%
2023+52.9%-26.8%
2024+31.9%+40.0%
2025+1.9%-37.6%
2026+33.0%+8.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CLH and MNOV good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.24, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CLH and MNOV?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CLH and MNOV is -0.24 over 3 years, -0.42 over 1 year and -0.13 over 5 years.

Is MNOV a good diversifier for CLH?

Yes: at -0.24, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.24 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/clh-vs-mnov.json

CLH vs MNOV: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24CLH vs MNOV-0.24

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CLH vs MNOV correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/clh-vs-mnov.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/clh-vs-mnov/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CLH correlations · MNOV correlations