PairBook
HomeCLDI › CLDI vs MTG

CLDI vs MTG: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Calidi Biotherapeutics, Inc. (CLDI) and MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG) carry a correlation of -0.24, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.05
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.17
long-run
Ann. covariance
-951.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CLDI and MTG?

Over the past 3 years, CLDI and MTG moved with a correlation of -0.24, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.05) than the 3-year average (-0.24). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.17, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -951.8 %².

Out of 14 assets tracked against CLDI, MTG lands near the bottom at #13. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months MTG outperformed by 108.6 percentage points (-95.1% for CLDI against +13.5% for MTG). One caveat on sizing: CLDI is 8.5 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CLDI vs MTG: side by side

CLDI (Calidi Biotherapeutics, Inc.)MTG (MGIC Investment Corporation)
1-year return-95.1%+13.5%
5-year return-100.0%+129.5%
Volatility (ann.)182.9%21.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.030.57
Max drawdown (3Y)-100.0%-15.8%
Market cap$6.4B
P/E (trailing)9.8
Dividend yield0.00%1.92%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: MTG 1.92% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MTG -15.8% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: MTG +129.5% vs -100.0%
-95%0%+12%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CLDI · MTG

Year-by-year returns

YearCLDIMTG
2022+3.7%-7.5%
2023-85.2%+52.4%
2024-92.4%+25.7%
2025-91.5%+25.9%
2026-93.1%+8.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CLDI and MTG good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.24 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CLDI and MTG?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CLDI and MTG is -0.24 over 3 years, 0.05 over 1 year and -0.17 over 5 years.

Is MTG a good diversifier for CLDI?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.24 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

A reading of -0.24 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cldi-vs-mtg.json

CLDI vs MTG: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24CLDI vs MTG-0.24

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CLDI vs MTG correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cldi-vs-mtg.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cldi-vs-mtg/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CLDI correlations · MTG correlations