CKX vs GEN: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, CKX Lands, Inc. (CKX) and Gen Digital (GEN) carry a correlation of -0.16, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CKX and GEN?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CKX and GEN correlate at -0.16, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.26) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.09, with an annualized covariance of -132.0 %².
By 3-year correlation, GEN places #9 of the 14 assets tracked against CKX. On 12-month performance GEN holds a 6.3-point edge, -5.1% against +1.2%.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CKX vs GEN: side by side
| CKX (CKX Lands, Inc.) | GEN (Gen Digital) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -5.1% | +1.2% |
| 5-year return | -7.1% | +26.3% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 25.7% | 31.7% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.01 | 1.02 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -37.0% | -43.6% |
| Market cap | – | $18.3B |
| P/E (trailing) | 7.5 | 17.3 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.69% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Information Technology |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CKX | GEN |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -11.2% | -15.8% |
| 2023 | +30.3% | +9.3% |
| 2024 | -2.8% | +22.4% |
| 2025 | -27.4% | +1.1% |
| 2026 | +16.4% | +13.9% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CKX and GEN good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.16, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CKX and GEN?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CKX and GEN is -0.16 over 3 years, -0.26 over 1 year and -0.09 over 5 years.
Is GEN a good diversifier for CKX?
Yes: at -0.16, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.16 mean?
A reading of -0.16 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ckx-vs-gen.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ckx-vs-gen/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CKX correlations · GEN correlations
