CIRC vs UNH: Correlation
Circle8 Group, Inc. (CIRC) and UnitedHealth Group (UNH) show a weak relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.28.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CIRC and UNH?
Over the past 3 years, CIRC and UNH moved with a correlation of 0.28, which is weak. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at 0.04 versus 0.28 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.23, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 2288.9 %².
By 3-year correlation, UNH places #6 of the 14 assets tracked against CIRC. The last year tells two different stories: UNH led by 117.0 percentage points, -83.5% for CIRC against +33.5% for UNH. One caveat on sizing: CIRC is 5.2 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CIRC vs UNH: side by side
| CIRC (Circle8 Group, Inc.) | UNH (UnitedHealth Group) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -83.5% | +33.5% |
| 5-year return | -99.7% | +3.1% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 207.6% | 39.8% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -0.24 | 0.17 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -98.0% | -61.4% |
| Market cap | $0.1B | $354.6B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 25.8 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.23% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Health Care |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CIRC | UNH |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -84.4% | +6.9% |
| 2023 | -64.5% | +0.8% |
| 2024 | +18.2% | -2.4% |
| 2025 | -72.7% | -33.1% |
| 2026 | -46.8% | +21.3% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CIRC and UNH good diversifiers for each other?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.28 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CIRC and UNH?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CIRC and UNH is 0.28 over 3 years, 0.04 over 1 year and 0.23 over 5 years.
Is UNH a good diversifier for CIRC?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.28 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.28 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/circ-vs-unh.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/circ-vs-unh/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CIRC correlations · UNH correlations