PairBook
HomeCINT › CINT vs PFLT

CINT vs PFLT: Correlation

CI&T Inc Class A (CINT) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.36.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.36
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.44
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.25
long-run
Ann. covariance
362.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CINT and PFLT?

On 3 years of weekly data the CINT/PFLT correlation comes out at 0.36, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.44 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.25, and annualized covariance runs at 362.0 %².

Few assets follow CINT as closely as PFLT, which ranks #3 of 12 tracked partners. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months PFLT outperformed by 20.1 percentage points (-36.1% for CINT against -16.0% for PFLT). Risk is not evenly split, since CINT carries 2.5 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CINT vs PFLT: side by side

CINT (CI&T Inc Class A)PFLT (PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.)
1-year return-36.1%-16.0%
5-year return-81.0%+1.5%
Volatility (ann.)49.9%20.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.920.69
Max drawdown (3Y)-60.2%-28.4%
Market cap$0.4B$0.7B
P/E (trailing)12.314.6
Dividend yield0.00%16.43%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: CINT 12.3 vs 14.6Higher yield: PFLT 16.43% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: PFLT -28.4% vs -60.2%Higher 5y return: PFLT +1.5% vs -81.0%
-40%0%+5%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CINT · PFLT

Year-by-year returns

YearCINTPFLT
2022-45.3%-5.5%
2023-19.1%+23.1%
2024+15.4%+0.7%
2025-32.9%-4.1%
2026-15.2%-12.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CINT and PFLT good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.36 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CINT and PFLT?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.36 over 3 years, with 0.44 over the last year and 0.25 over 5 years.

Is PFLT a good diversifier for CINT?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.36 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.36 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cint-vs-pflt.json

CINT vs PFLT: 3-year weekly correlation 0.36CINT vs PFLT0.36

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CINT vs PFLT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cint-vs-pflt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cint-vs-pflt/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CINT correlations · PFLT correlations