PairBook
HomeCIM › CIM vs QQQ

CIM vs QQQ: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) and Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) carry a correlation of 0.27, a weak link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.27
weak
Correlation (1Y)
0.23
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.46
long-run
Ann. covariance
153.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CIM and QQQ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CIM and QQQ correlate at 0.27, weak. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.23) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.46, with an annualized covariance of 153.3 %².

QQQ is close to the least connected end of CIM's tracked universe, ranking #8 of 11. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with QQQ ahead by 33.2 points (-6.9% versus +26.3%).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CIM vs QQQ: side by side

CIM (Chimera Investment Corporation)QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust)
1-year return-6.9%+26.3%
5-year return-54.1%+95.4%
Volatility (ann.)29.4%19.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.761.28
Max drawdown (3Y)-33.1%-22.8%
Market cap$1.0B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield14.29%0.44%
Expense ratio0.18%
Assets under management$452.8B
Sector / categoryUS ListedETF · US Growth & Tech
Higher yield: CIM 14.29% vs 0.44%Smaller drawdown: QQQ -22.8% vs -33.1%Higher 5y return: QQQ +95.4% vs -54.1%

QQQ is a Large Growth fund from Invesco: $452.8B under management, 104 holdings, a 0.18% expense ratio, a 0.44% trailing dividend yield.

-16%0%+29%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CIM · QQQ

Year-by-year returns

YearCIMQQQ
2022-57.9%-32.6%
2023+2.9%+54.9%
2024+3.6%+25.6%
2025-0.6%+20.8%
2026-0.7%+17.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CIM and QQQ good diversifiers for each other?

A fair diversifier. At 0.27, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CIM and QQQ?

The CIM/QQQ correlation stands at 0.27 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.23, 5 years: 0.46), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is QQQ a good diversifier for CIM?

A fair diversifier. At 0.27, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

What does a correlation of 0.27 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cim-vs-qqq.json

CIM vs QQQ: 3-year weekly correlation 0.27CIM vs QQQ0.27

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CIM vs QQQ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cim-vs-qqq.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cim-vs-qqq/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CIM correlations · QQQ correlations