PairBook
HomeCII › CII vs CSQ

CII vs CSQ: Correlation

BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund, Inc. (CII) and Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund - Closed End Fund (CSQ) show a very strong relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.82.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.82
very strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.68
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.86
long-run
Ann. covariance
273.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CII and CSQ?

On 3 years of weekly data the CII/CSQ correlation comes out at 0.82, very strong, meaning they move nearly in lockstep. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.68) runs below the 3-year figure (0.82). The 5-year figure is 0.86, and annualized covariance runs at 273.0 %².

In CII's tracked universe of 12 assets, CSQ sits right near the top at #3. On 12-month performance CII holds a 9.6-point edge, +31.0% against +21.4%.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CII vs CSQ: side by side

CII (BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund, Inc.)CSQ (Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund - Closed End Fund)
1-year return+31.0%+21.4%
5-year return+85.9%+64.2%
Volatility (ann.)17.7%18.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.971.22
Max drawdown (3Y)-21.1%-24.2%
Market cap$1.0B$3.4B
P/E (trailing)4.83.2
Dividend yield8.38%2.95%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: CSQ 3.2 vs 4.8Higher yield: CII 8.38% vs 2.95%Smaller drawdown: CII -21.1% vs -24.2%Higher 5y return: CII +85.9% vs +64.2%
-7%0%+33%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CII · CSQ

Year-by-year returns

YearCIICSQ
2022-13.2%-24.2%
2023+18.5%+20.9%
2024+12.7%+28.2%
2025+37.8%+16.3%
2026+11.2%+14.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CII and CSQ good diversifiers for each other?

No. With a correlation of 0.82, CII and CSQ move nearly in lockstep, so holding both adds very little diversification.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CII and CSQ?

The CII/CSQ correlation stands at 0.82 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.68, 5 years: 0.86), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is CSQ a good diversifier for CII?

No. With a correlation of 0.82, CII and CSQ move nearly in lockstep, so holding both adds very little diversification.

What does a correlation of 0.82 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cii-vs-csq.json

CII vs CSQ: 3-year weekly correlation 0.82CII vs CSQ0.82

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CII vs CSQ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cii-vs-csq.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cii-vs-csq/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CII correlations · CSQ correlations