CHTR vs RBCAA: Correlation
Charter Communications (CHTR) and Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.46.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CHTR and RBCAA?
Over the past 3 years, CHTR and RBCAA moved with a correlation of 0.46, which is moderate. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.32) runs below the 3-year figure (0.46). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.40, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 529.2 %².
Within CHTR's tracked universe of 35 assets, RBCAA comes in at #15 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: RBCAA led by 70.0 percentage points, -44.9% for CHTR against +25.1% for RBCAA.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CHTR vs RBCAA: side by side
| CHTR (Charter Communications) | RBCAA (Republic Bancorp, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -44.9% | +25.1% |
| 5-year return | -81.8% | +117.3% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 41.3% | 28.1% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.74 | 0.68 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -72.9% | -21.6% |
| Market cap | $20.0B | $1.8B |
| P/E (trailing) | 4.0 | 14.4 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.01% |
| Sector / category | Communication Services | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CHTR | RBCAA |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -48.0% | -16.9% |
| 2023 | +14.6% | +39.4% |
| 2024 | -11.8% | +30.3% |
| 2025 | -39.1% | +1.3% |
| 2026 | -28.9% | +38.0% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CHTR and RBCAA good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.46, CHTR and RBCAA keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CHTR and RBCAA?
The CHTR/RBCAA correlation stands at 0.46 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.32, 5 years: 0.40), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is RBCAA a good diversifier for CHTR?
Reasonably. At 0.46, CHTR and RBCAA keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.46 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.46 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/chtr-vs-rbcaa.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/chtr-vs-rbcaa/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CHTR correlations · RBCAA correlations
