PairBook
HomeCHTR › CHTR vs PAPL

CHTR vs PAPL: Correlation

How closely do Charter Communications (CHTR) and Pineapple Financial Inc. (PAPL) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.16, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.16
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.26
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1215.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CHTR and PAPL?

Over the past 3 years, CHTR and PAPL moved with a correlation of -0.16, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.26 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -1215.9 %².

Among the 35 assets we track against CHTR, PAPL ranks #28 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with CHTR ahead by 25.8 points (-44.9% versus -70.7%). One caveat on sizing: PAPL is 4.4 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CHTR vs PAPL: side by side

CHTR (Charter Communications)PAPL (Pineapple Financial Inc.)
1-year return-44.9%-70.7%
5-year return-81.8%n/a
Volatility (ann.)41.3%181.2%
Beta vs S&P 5000.74-0.73
Max drawdown (3Y)-72.9%-99.4%
Market cap$20.0B
P/E (trailing)4.0
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryCommunication ServicesUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: CHTR -72.9% vs -99.4%
-91%0%+7%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CHTR · PAPL

Year-by-year returns

YearCHTRPAPL
2022-48.0%
2023+14.6%
2024-11.8%-74.7%
2025-39.1%-84.4%
2026-28.9%-25.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CHTR and PAPL good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.16, CHTR and PAPL have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CHTR and PAPL?

The CHTR/PAPL correlation stands at -0.16 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.26, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is PAPL a good diversifier for CHTR?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.16, CHTR and PAPL have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.16 mean?

A reading of -0.16 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/chtr-vs-papl.json

CHTR vs PAPL: 3-year weekly correlation -0.16CHTR vs PAPL-0.16

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CHTR vs PAPL correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/chtr-vs-papl.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/chtr-vs-papl/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CHTR correlations · PAPL correlations