PairBook
HomeCHRW › CHRW vs FCUV

CHRW vs FCUV: Correlation

C.H. Robinson (CHRW) and Focus Universal Inc. (FCUV) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.30.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.30
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.44
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.22
long-run
Ann. covariance
-3122.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CHRW and FCUV?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CHRW and FCUV correlate at -0.30, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.44 versus -0.30 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.22, with an annualized covariance of -3122.9 %².

FCUV is close to the least connected end of CHRW's tracked universe, ranking #31 of 31. The last year tells two different stories: CHRW led by 105.7 percentage points, +19.9% for CHRW against -85.8% for FCUV. Risk is not evenly split, since FCUV carries 8.1 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CHRW vs FCUV: side by side

CHRW (C.H. Robinson)FCUV (Focus Universal Inc.)
1-year return+19.9%-85.8%
5-year return+86.8%-99.4%
Volatility (ann.)35.7%287.5%
Beta vs S&P 5000.690.68
Max drawdown (3Y)-32.4%-99.8%
Market cap$17.7B
P/E (trailing)29.0
Dividend yield1.65%0.00%
Sector / categoryIndustrialsUS Listed
Higher yield: CHRW 1.65% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: CHRW -32.4% vs -99.8%Higher 5y return: CHRW +86.8% vs -99.4%
-97%0%+126%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CHRW · FCUV

Year-by-year returns

YearCHRWFCUV
2022-13.1%-27.7%
2023-3.1%-65.8%
2024+22.9%-76.0%
2025+59.0%-76.9%
2026-5.3%-67.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CHRW and FCUV good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.30 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CHRW and FCUV?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CHRW and FCUV is -0.30 over 3 years, -0.44 over 1 year and -0.22 over 5 years.

Is FCUV a good diversifier for CHRW?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.30 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.30 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/chrw-vs-fcuv.json

CHRW vs FCUV: 3-year weekly correlation -0.30CHRW vs FCUV-0.30

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CHRW vs FCUV correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/chrw-vs-fcuv.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/chrw-vs-fcuv/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CHRW correlations · FCUV correlations