PairBook
HomeCHPT › CHPT vs VT

CHPT vs VT: Correlation

ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.48.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.48
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.53
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.50
long-run
Ann. covariance
513.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CHPT and VT?

Over the past 3 years, CHPT and VT moved with a correlation of 0.48, which is moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.53 over 1 year against 0.48 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.50, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 513.2 %².

By 3-year correlation, VT places #5 of the 16 assets tracked against CHPT. The last year tells two different stories: VT led by 71.8 percentage points, -49.1% for CHPT against +22.7% for VT. Risk is not evenly split, since CHPT carries 5.5 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CHPT vs VT: side by side

CHPT (ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.)VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF)
1-year return-49.1%+22.7%
5-year return-98.6%+67.7%
Volatility (ann.)76.7%13.9%
Beta vs S&P 5002.400.92
Max drawdown (3Y)-97.0%-16.5%
Market cap$0.2B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%1.59%
Expense ratio0.06%
Assets under management$97.9B
Sector / categoryUS ListedETF · Global
Higher yield: VT 1.59% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: VT -16.5% vs -97.0%Higher 5y return: VT +67.7% vs -98.6%

VT is a Global Large-Stock Blend fund from Vanguard: $97.9B under management, 5308 holdings, a 0.06% expense ratio, a 1.59% trailing dividend yield.

-54%0%+23%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CHPT · VT

Year-by-year returns

YearCHPTVT
2022-50.0%-18.0%
2023-75.4%+22.0%
2024-54.3%+16.5%
2025-69.0%+22.4%
2026-12.2%+15.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CHPT and VT good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.48 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CHPT and VT?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.48 over 3 years, with 0.53 over the last year and 0.50 over 5 years.

Is VT a good diversifier for CHPT?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.48 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.48 mean?

A reading of 0.48 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/chpt-vs-vt.json

CHPT vs VT: 3-year weekly correlation 0.48CHPT vs VT0.48

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CHPT vs VT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/chpt-vs-vt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/chpt-vs-vt/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CHPT correlations · VT correlations