PairBook
HomeCGTX › CGTX vs WM

CGTX vs WM: Correlation

How closely do Cognition Therapeutics, Inc. (CGTX) and Waste Management (WM) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.26, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.26
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.01
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.10
long-run
Ann. covariance
-630.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CGTX and WM?

Over the past 3 years, CGTX and WM moved with a correlation of -0.26, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.01 versus -0.26 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.10, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -630.2 %².

Among the 11 assets we track against CGTX, WM sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #9. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months WM outperformed by 63.4 percentage points (-65.4% for CGTX against -2.0% for WM). Risk is not evenly split, since CGTX carries 7.3 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CGTX vs WM: side by side

CGTX (Cognition Therapeutics, Inc.)WM (Waste Management)
1-year return-65.4%-2.0%
5-year return-91.7%+51.8%
Volatility (ann.)134.0%18.3%
Beta vs S&P 5002.370.07
Max drawdown (3Y)-90.9%-18.1%
Market cap$0.1B$87.0B
P/E (trailing)30.8
Dividend yield0.00%1.60%
Sector / categoryUS ListedIndustrials
Higher yield: WM 1.60% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: WM -18.1% vs -90.9%Higher 5y return: WM +51.8% vs -91.7%
-72%0%+13%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CGTX · WM

Year-by-year returns

YearCGTXWM
2022-66.8%-4.5%
2023-11.9%+16.2%
2024-62.1%+14.3%
2025+92.6%+10.5%
2026-21.5%-0.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CGTX and WM good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.26 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CGTX and WM?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CGTX and WM is -0.26 over 3 years, 0.01 over 1 year and -0.10 over 5 years.

Is WM a good diversifier for CGTX?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.26 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.26 mean?

A reading of -0.26 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cgtx-vs-wm.json

CGTX vs WM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.26CGTX vs WM-0.26

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CGTX vs WM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cgtx-vs-wm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cgtx-vs-wm/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CGTX correlations · WM correlations