PairBook
HomeCGNT › CGNT vs TRI

CGNT vs TRI: Correlation

How closely do Cognyte Software Ltd. (CGNT) and Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.46, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.46
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.59
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.34
long-run
Ann. covariance
714.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CGNT and TRI?

Over the past 3 years, CGNT and TRI moved with a correlation of 0.46, which is moderate. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.59 versus 0.46 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.34, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 714.9 %².

TRI is one of the assets that tracks CGNT most closely: it ranks #2 out of the 15 assets we track against CGNT. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months CGNT outperformed by 41.0 percentage points (+3.4% for CGNT against -37.6% for TRI). Risk is not evenly split, since CGNT carries 1.5 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CGNT vs TRI: side by side

CGNT (Cognyte Software Ltd.)TRI (Thomson Reuters Corp)
1-year return+3.4%-37.6%
5-year return-67.0%-0.4%
Volatility (ann.)49.0%32.0%
Beta vs S&P 5001.000.53
Max drawdown (3Y)-44.3%-62.9%
Market cap$0.7B$45.4B
P/E (trailing)27.6
Dividend yield0.00%2.48%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: TRI 2.48% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: CGNT -44.3% vs -62.9%Higher 5y return: TRI -0.4% vs -67.0%
-53%0%+28%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CGNT · TRI

Year-by-year returns

YearCGNTTRI
2022-80.2%-3.0%
2023+106.8%+30.0%
2024+34.5%+11.1%
2025+8.7%-16.6%
2026-4.0%-17.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CGNT and TRI good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.46, CGNT and TRI keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CGNT and TRI?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CGNT and TRI is 0.46 over 3 years, 0.59 over 1 year and 0.34 over 5 years.

Is TRI a good diversifier for CGNT?

Reasonably. At 0.46, CGNT and TRI keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.46 mean?

A reading of 0.46 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cgnt-vs-tri.json

CGNT vs TRI: 3-year weekly correlation 0.46CGNT vs TRI0.46

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CGNT vs TRI correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cgnt-vs-tri.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cgnt-vs-tri/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CGNT correlations · TRI correlations