CG vs RPC: Correlation
How closely do The Carlyle Group Inc. (CG) and Ridgepost Capital, Inc. (RPC) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.60, which is strong.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CG and RPC?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CG and RPC correlate at 0.60, strong. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.68 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.50, with an annualized covariance of 845.4 %².
By 3-year correlation, RPC places #13 of the 21 assets tracked against CG. The trailing year gives CG the advantage: -21.8% versus -28.8%, a 7.0-point spread.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CG vs RPC: side by side
| CG (The Carlyle Group Inc.) | RPC (Ridgepost Capital, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -21.8% | -28.8% |
| 5-year return | +18.0% | -23.6% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 36.8% | 38.1% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.68 | 1.41 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -40.4% | -50.2% |
| Market cap | $17.5B | $1.0B |
| P/E (trailing) | 50.8 | 36.3 |
| Dividend yield | 2.86% | 1.70% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CG | RPC |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -43.8% | -23.1% |
| 2023 | +42.6% | -3.0% |
| 2024 | +28.1% | +25.2% |
| 2025 | +20.2% | -21.2% |
| 2026 | -14.9% | -10.4% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CG and RPC good diversifiers for each other?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.60 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CG and RPC?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.60 over 3 years, with 0.68 over the last year and 0.50 over 5 years.
Is RPC a good diversifier for CG?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.60 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
What does a correlation of 0.60 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.60 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cg-vs-rpc.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cg-vs-rpc/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CG correlations · RPC correlations
