PairBook
HomeCETY › CETY vs GMED

CETY vs GMED: Correlation

How closely do Clean Energy Technologies, Inc. (CETY) and Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.20, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.27
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-866.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CETY and GMED?

Over the past 3 years, CETY and GMED moved with a correlation of -0.20, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.27 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -866.1 %².

Among the 10 assets we track against CETY, GMED sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #10. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with GMED ahead by 108.3 points (-74.1% versus +34.2%). One caveat on sizing: CETY is 2.5 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CETY vs GMED: side by side

CETY (Clean Energy Technologies, Inc.)GMED (Globus Medical, Inc.)
1-year return-74.1%+34.2%
5-year returnn/a+0.4%
Volatility (ann.)102.9%41.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.530.74
Max drawdown (3Y)-98.5%-44.4%
Market cap$11.1B
P/E (trailing)21.1
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: GMED -44.4% vs -98.5%
-84%0%+58%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CETY · GMED

Year-by-year returns

YearCETYGMED
2022+2.9%
2023-28.2%
2024-59.1%+55.2%
2025-92.1%+5.6%
2026+35.2%-5.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CETY and GMED good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.20, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CETY and GMED?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CETY and GMED is -0.20 over 3 years, -0.27 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is GMED a good diversifier for CETY?

Yes: at -0.20, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cety-vs-gmed.json

CETY vs GMED: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20CETY vs GMED-0.20

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CETY vs GMED correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cety-vs-gmed.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cety-vs-gmed/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CETY correlations · GMED correlations