PairBook
HomeCDTG › CDTG vs RCL

CDTG vs RCL: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited (CDTG) and Royal Caribbean Group (RCL) carry a correlation of -0.22, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.24
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1492.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CDTG and RCL?

On 3 years of weekly data the CDTG/RCL correlation comes out at -0.22, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.24 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -1492.5 %².

Within CDTG's tracked universe of 34 assets, RCL comes in at #20 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: RCL led by 73.3 percentage points, -92.6% for CDTG against -19.3% for RCL. Note the risk asymmetry: CDTG runs 3.9 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CDTG vs RCL: side by side

CDTG (CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited)RCL (Royal Caribbean Group)
1-year return-92.6%-19.3%
5-year returnn/a+257.6%
Volatility (ann.)160.6%41.3%
Beta vs S&P 5000.421.46
Max drawdown (3Y)-99.2%-35.0%
Market cap$76.2B
P/E (trailing)17.9
Dividend yield0.00%1.72%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Discretionary
Higher yield: RCL 1.72% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: RCL -35.0% vs -99.2%
-94%0%+53%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CDTG · RCL

Year-by-year returns

YearCDTGRCL
2022-35.7%
2023+162.0%
2024+79.0%
2025-92.2%+22.5%
2026-87.0%+3.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CDTG and RCL good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.22, CDTG and RCL have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CDTG and RCL?

The CDTG/RCL correlation stands at -0.22 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.24, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is RCL a good diversifier for CDTG?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.22, CDTG and RCL have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

A reading of -0.22 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cdtg-vs-rcl.json

CDTG vs RCL: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22CDTG vs RCL-0.22

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CDTG vs RCL correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cdtg-vs-rcl.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cdtg-vs-rcl/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CDTG correlations · RCL correlations