PairBook
HomeCDTG › CDTG vs FITB

CDTG vs FITB: Correlation

How closely do CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited (CDTG) and Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.15, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.15
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.00
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-641.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CDTG and FITB?

On 3 years of weekly data the CDTG/FITB correlation comes out at -0.15, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.00 versus -0.15 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -641.0 %².

By 3-year correlation, FITB places #8 of the 34 assets tracked against CDTG. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with FITB ahead by 117.2 points (-92.6% versus +24.6%). One caveat on sizing: CDTG is 5.5 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CDTG vs FITB: side by side

CDTG (CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited)FITB (Fifth Third Bancorp)
1-year return-92.6%+24.6%
5-year returnn/a+71.2%
Volatility (ann.)160.6%29.4%
Beta vs S&P 5000.421.03
Max drawdown (3Y)-99.2%-29.9%
Market cap$49.7B
P/E (trailing)18.5
Dividend yield0.00%2.90%
Sector / categoryUS ListedFinancials
Higher yield: FITB 2.90% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: FITB -29.9% vs -99.2%
-94%0%+53%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CDTG · FITB

Year-by-year returns

YearCDTGFITB
2022-21.9%
2023+10.4%
2024+27.2%
2025-92.2%+14.8%
2026-87.0%+19.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CDTG and FITB good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.15 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CDTG and FITB?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.15 over 3 years, with 0.00 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.

Is FITB a good diversifier for CDTG?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.15 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.15 mean?

A reading of -0.15 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cdtg-vs-fitb.json

CDTG vs FITB: 3-year weekly correlation -0.15CDTG vs FITB-0.15

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CDTG vs FITB correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cdtg-vs-fitb.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cdtg-vs-fitb/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CDTG correlations · FITB correlations