PairBook
HomeCDTG › CDTG vs ECL

CDTG vs ECL: Correlation

How closely do CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited (CDTG) and Ecolab (ECL) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.23, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.23
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.25
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-724.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CDTG and ECL?

Over the past 3 years, CDTG and ECL moved with a correlation of -0.23, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.25) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -724.6 %².

By 3-year correlation, ECL places #24 of the 34 assets tracked against CDTG. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with ECL ahead by 95.7 points (-92.6% versus +3.1%). One caveat on sizing: CDTG is 8.2 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CDTG vs ECL: side by side

CDTG (CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited)ECL (Ecolab)
1-year return-92.6%+3.1%
5-year returnn/a+34.0%
Volatility (ann.)160.6%19.5%
Beta vs S&P 5000.420.64
Max drawdown (3Y)-99.2%-20.1%
Market cap$80.1B
P/E (trailing)39.1
Dividend yield0.00%0.98%
Sector / categoryUS ListedMaterials
Higher yield: ECL 0.98% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: ECL -20.1% vs -99.2%
-94%0%+53%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CDTG · ECL

Year-by-year returns

YearCDTGECL
2022-37.1%
2023+37.9%
2024+19.3%
2025-92.2%+13.2%
2026-87.0%+9.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CDTG and ECL good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.23, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CDTG and ECL?

The CDTG/ECL correlation stands at -0.23 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.25, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is ECL a good diversifier for CDTG?

Yes: at -0.23, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?

A reading of -0.23 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cdtg-vs-ecl.json

CDTG vs ECL: 3-year weekly correlation -0.23CDTG vs ECL-0.23

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CDTG vs ECL correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cdtg-vs-ecl.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cdtg-vs-ecl/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CDTG correlations · ECL correlations