PairBook
HomeCDNS › CDNS vs POR

CDNS vs POR: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) and Portland General Electric Co (POR) carry a correlation of -0.23, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.23
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.12
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.04
long-run
Ann. covariance
-150.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CDNS and POR?

Over the past 3 years, CDNS and POR moved with a correlation of -0.23, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (-0.12) than the 3-year average (-0.23). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.04, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -150.8 %².

Among the 34 assets we track against CDNS, POR ranks #28 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: POR led by 20.8 percentage points, +0.2% for CDNS against +21.0% for POR. Risk is not evenly split, since CDNS carries 1.9 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CDNS vs POR: side by side

CDNS (Cadence Design Systems)POR (Portland General Electric Co)
1-year return+0.2%+21.0%
5-year return+112.1%+20.7%
Volatility (ann.)35.8%18.5%
Beta vs S&P 5001.450.10
Max drawdown (3Y)-29.1%-16.3%
Market cap$95.7B$5.9B
P/E (trailing)66.722.2
Dividend yield0.00%4.24%
Sector / categoryInformation TechnologyUS Listed
Lower P/E: POR 22.2 vs 66.7Higher yield: POR 4.24% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: POR -16.3% vs -29.1%Higher 5y return: CDNS +112.1% vs +20.7%
-24%0%+30%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CDNS · POR

Year-by-year returns

YearCDNSPOR
2022-13.8%-4.0%
2023+69.6%-7.7%
2024+10.3%+5.3%
2025+4.0%+15.4%
2026+11.2%+6.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CDNS and POR good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.23 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CDNS and POR?

The CDNS/POR correlation stands at -0.23 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.12, 5 years: -0.04), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is POR a good diversifier for CDNS?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.23 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?

A reading of -0.23 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cdns-vs-por.json

CDNS vs POR: 3-year weekly correlation -0.23CDNS vs POR-0.23

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CDNS vs POR correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cdns-vs-por.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cdns-vs-por/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CDNS correlations · POR correlations