PairBook
HomeCCZ › CCZ vs TII

CCZ vs TII: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Comcast Holdings ZONES (CCZ) and Titan Mining Corporation (TII) carry a correlation of -0.27, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.27
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.09
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.04
long-run
Ann. covariance
-560.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CCZ and TII?

Over the past 3 years, CCZ and TII moved with a correlation of -0.27, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.09) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.27). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.04, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -560.9 %².

TII is close to the least connected end of CCZ's tracked universe, ranking #8 of 10. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months TII outperformed by 93.7 percentage points (+12.4% for CCZ against +106.1% for TII). Note the risk asymmetry: TII runs 4.3 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CCZ vs TII: side by side

CCZ (Comcast Holdings ZONES)TII (Titan Mining Corporation)
1-year return+12.4%+106.1%
5-year return+24.7%+633.2%
Volatility (ann.)21.9%94.7%
Beta vs S&P 5000.350.43
Max drawdown (3Y)-16.3%-63.6%
Market cap$0.3B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: CCZ -16.3% vs -63.6%Higher 5y return: TII +633.2% vs +24.7%
-2%0%+260%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CCZ · TII

Year-by-year returns

YearCCZTII
2022-8.9%-15.7%
2023+3.8%-25.1%
2024+10.6%-19.3%
2025+1.3%+826.4%
2026+12.3%-3.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CCZ and TII good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.27 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CCZ and TII?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CCZ and TII is -0.27 over 3 years, 0.09 over 1 year and -0.04 over 5 years.

Is TII a good diversifier for CCZ?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.27 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.27 mean?

A reading of -0.27 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ccz-vs-tii.json

CCZ vs TII: 3-year weekly correlation -0.27CCZ vs TII-0.27

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CCZ vs TII correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ccz-vs-tii.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ccz-vs-tii/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CCZ correlations · TII correlations