PairBook
HomeCCOI › CCOI vs MNST

CCOI vs MNST: Correlation

How closely do Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. (CCOI) and Monster Beverage (MNST) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.36, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.36
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.43
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.29
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1578.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CCOI and MNST?

Over the past 3 years, CCOI and MNST moved with a correlation of -0.36, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.43 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.29, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -1578.5 %².

Out of 13 assets tracked against CCOI, MNST lands near the bottom at #13. The last year tells two different stories: MNST led by 50.0 percentage points, -74.3% for CCOI against -24.3% for MNST.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CCOI vs MNST: side by side

CCOI (Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc.)MNST (Monster Beverage)
1-year return-74.3%-24.3%
5-year return-83.0%-4.5%
Volatility (ann.)63.2%68.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.570.80
Max drawdown (3Y)-88.3%-54.5%
Market cap$0.5B$91.5B
P/E (trailing)43.2
Dividend yield10.70%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Staples
Higher yield: CCOI 10.70% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MNST -54.5% vs -88.3%Higher 5y return: MNST -4.5% vs -83.0%
-75%0%+56%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CCOI · MNST

Year-by-year returns

YearCCOIMNST
2022-17.2%+5.7%
2023+41.2%+13.5%
2024+7.2%-8.8%
2025-70.1%+45.9%
2026-55.0%-39.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CCOI and MNST good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.36, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CCOI and MNST?

The CCOI/MNST correlation stands at -0.36 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.43, 5 years: -0.29), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is MNST a good diversifier for CCOI?

Yes: at -0.36, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.36 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ccoi-vs-mnst.json

CCOI vs MNST: 3-year weekly correlation -0.36CCOI vs MNST-0.36

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CCOI vs MNST correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ccoi-vs-mnst.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ccoi-vs-mnst/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CCOI correlations · MNST correlations