PairBook
HomeCCL › CCL vs MACI

CCL vs MACI: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Carnival Corporation (CCL) and Melar Acquisition Corp. I - Class A (MACI) carry a correlation of -0.21, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.21
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.26
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-19.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CCL and MACI?

On 3 years of weekly data the CCL/MACI correlation comes out at -0.21, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.26 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -19.8 %².

Within CCL's tracked universe of 40 assets, MACI comes in at #31 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: MACI led by 26.0 percentage points, -21.6% for CCL against +4.4% for MACI. Note the risk asymmetry: CCL runs 22.1 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CCL vs MACI: side by side

CCL (Carnival Corporation)MACI (Melar Acquisition Corp. I - Class A)
1-year return-21.6%+4.4%
5-year return+7.3%n/a
Volatility (ann.)46.5%2.1%
Beta vs S&P 5001.72-0.03
Max drawdown (3Y)-42.3%-2.0%
Market cap$34.2B$0.2B
P/E (trailing)11.560.9
Dividend yield1.17%0.00%
Sector / categoryConsumer DiscretionaryUS Listed
Lower P/E: CCL 11.5 vs 60.9Higher yield: CCL 1.17% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MACI -2.0% vs -42.3%
-24%0%+8%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CCL · MACI

Year-by-year returns

YearCCLMACI
2022-59.9%
2023+130.0%
2024+34.4%
2025+22.6%+5.7%
2026-17.0%+3.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CCL and MACI good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.21, CCL and MACI have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CCL and MACI?

The CCL/MACI correlation stands at -0.21 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.26, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is MACI a good diversifier for CCL?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.21, CCL and MACI have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?

A reading of -0.21 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ccl-vs-maci.json

CCL vs MACI: 3-year weekly correlation -0.21CCL vs MACI-0.21

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CCL vs MACI correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ccl-vs-maci.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ccl-vs-maci/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CCL correlations · MACI correlations