PairBook
HomeCCG › CCG vs WLFC

CCG vs WLFC: Correlation

Cheche Group Inc. - Class A (CCG) and Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.60.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.60
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.77
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-58100.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CCG and WLFC?

Over the past 3 years, CCG and WLFC moved with a correlation of -0.60, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.77 versus -0.60 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -58100.5 %².

Among the 10 assets we track against CCG, WLFC sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #10. The last year tells two different stories: CCG led by 1924.7 percentage points, +1861.4% for CCG against -63.3% for WLFC. One caveat on sizing: CCG is 25.5 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CCG vs WLFC: side by side

CCG (Cheche Group Inc. - Class A)WLFC (Willis Lease Finance Corporation)
1-year return+1861.4%-63.3%
5-year returnn/a+47.2%
Volatility (ann.)1560.5%61.3%
Beta vs S&P 500-3.241.30
Max drawdown (3Y)-99.5%-77.4%
Market cap$1.2B
P/E (trailing)13.8
Dividend yield0.00%0.88%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: WLFC 0.88% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: WLFC -77.4% vs -99.5%
-63%0%+1468%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CCG · WLFC

Year-by-year returns

YearCCGWLFC
2022+56.7%
2023-17.2%
2024-86.2%+327.3%
2025-6.7%-34.5%
2026+1856.6%-59.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CCG and WLFC good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.60 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CCG and WLFC?

The CCG/WLFC correlation stands at -0.60 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.77, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is WLFC a good diversifier for CCG?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.60 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.60 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ccg-vs-wlfc.json

CCG vs WLFC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.60CCG vs WLFC-0.60

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CCG vs WLFC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ccg-vs-wlfc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ccg-vs-wlfc/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CCG correlations · WLFC correlations