PairBook
HomeCC › CC vs VXZ

CC vs VXZ: Correlation

How closely do Chemours Company (The) (CC) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.32, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.32
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.22
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.38
long-run
Ann. covariance
-493.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CC and VXZ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CC and VXZ correlate at -0.32, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.22) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.38, with an annualized covariance of -493.5 %².

Out of 13 assets tracked against CC, VXZ lands near the bottom at #12. The last year tells two different stories: CC led by 22.6 percentage points, +6.5% for CC against -16.1% for VXZ. One caveat on sizing: CC is 2.3 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CC vs VXZ: side by side

CC (Chemours Company (The))VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+6.5%-16.1%
5-year return-44.8%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)59.7%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.61-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-70.9%-36.4%
Market cap$2.4B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield2.22%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -70.9%Higher 5y return: CC -44.8% vs -53.1%
-29%0%+79%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CC · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearCCVXZ
2022-6.0%+0.5%
2023+6.5%-44.0%
2024-44.0%-12.7%
2025-27.6%+5.7%
2026+36.6%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CC and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.32 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CC and VXZ?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.32 over 3 years, with -0.22 over the last year and -0.38 over 5 years.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for CC?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.32 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.32 mean?

A reading of -0.32 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cc-vs-vxz.json

CC vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.32CC vs VXZ-0.32

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CC vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cc-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cc-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CC correlations · VXZ correlations