PairBook
HomeCBOE › CBOE vs RFL

CBOE vs RFL: Correlation

How closely do Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) and Rafael Holdings, Inc. (RFL) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.20, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.24
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.08
long-run
Ann. covariance
-320.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CBOE and RFL?

On 3 years of weekly data the CBOE/RFL correlation comes out at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.24 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.08, and annualized covariance runs at -320.8 %².

Within CBOE's tracked universe of 39 assets, RFL comes in at #23 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with RFL ahead by 25.5 points (+32.5% versus +58.0%). Note the risk asymmetry: RFL runs 2.3 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CBOE vs RFL: side by side

CBOE (Cboe Global Markets)RFL (Rafael Holdings, Inc.)
1-year return+32.5%+58.0%
5-year return+168.0%-94.5%
Volatility (ann.)26.1%61.2%
Beta vs S&P 5000.090.61
Max drawdown (3Y)-36.7%-59.3%
Market cap$32.8B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)24.5
Dividend yield0.92%0.00%
Sector / categoryFinancialsUS Listed
Higher yield: CBOE 0.92% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: CBOE -36.7% vs -59.3%Higher 5y return: CBOE +168.0% vs -94.5%
-19%0%+119%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CBOE · RFL

Year-by-year returns

YearCBOERFL
2022-2.2%-63.3%
2023+44.4%-2.1%
2024+10.7%-9.8%
2025+29.2%-27.5%
2026+25.7%+100.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CBOE and RFL good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, CBOE and RFL have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CBOE and RFL?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CBOE and RFL is -0.20 over 3 years, -0.24 over 1 year and -0.08 over 5 years.

Is RFL a good diversifier for CBOE?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, CBOE and RFL have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.20 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cboe-vs-rfl.json

CBOE vs RFL: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20CBOE vs RFL-0.20

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CBOE vs RFL correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cboe-vs-rfl.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cboe-vs-rfl/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CBOE correlations · RFL correlations