PairBook
HomeCBOE › CBOE vs ICCM

CBOE vs ICCM: Correlation

Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) and IceCure Medical Ltd. (ICCM) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.26.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.26
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.37
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.15
long-run
Ann. covariance
-782.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CBOE and ICCM?

Over the past 3 years, CBOE and ICCM moved with a correlation of -0.26, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.37 versus -0.26 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.15, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -782.5 %².

By 3-year correlation, ICCM places #32 of the 39 assets tracked against CBOE. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with CBOE ahead by 124.8 points (+32.5% versus -92.3%). Note the risk asymmetry: ICCM runs 4.5 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CBOE vs ICCM: side by side

CBOE (Cboe Global Markets)ICCM (IceCure Medical Ltd.)
1-year return+32.5%-92.3%
5-year return+168.0%-99.3%
Volatility (ann.)26.1%117.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.090.41
Max drawdown (3Y)-36.7%-95.4%
Market cap$32.8B
P/E (trailing)24.5
Dividend yield0.92%0.00%
Sector / categoryFinancialsUS Listed
Higher yield: CBOE 0.92% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: CBOE -36.7% vs -95.4%Higher 5y return: CBOE +168.0% vs -99.3%
-93%0%+56%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CBOE · ICCM

Year-by-year returns

YearCBOEICCM
2022-2.2%-49.2%
2023+44.4%-31.0%
2024+10.7%+2.8%
2025+29.2%-44.5%
2026+25.7%-87.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CBOE and ICCM good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.26, CBOE and ICCM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CBOE and ICCM?

The CBOE/ICCM correlation stands at -0.26 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.37, 5 years: -0.15), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is ICCM a good diversifier for CBOE?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.26, CBOE and ICCM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.26 mean?

A reading of -0.26 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cboe-vs-iccm.json

CBOE vs ICCM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.26CBOE vs ICCM-0.26

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CBOE vs ICCM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cboe-vs-iccm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cboe-vs-iccm/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CBOE correlations · ICCM correlations