PairBook
HomeCBL › CBL vs NHTC

CBL vs NHTC: Correlation

CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. (CBL) and Natural Health Trends Corp. (NHTC) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.21.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.21
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.38
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.04
long-run
Ann. covariance
-227.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CBL and NHTC?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CBL and NHTC correlate at -0.21, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.38) than the 3-year average (-0.21). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.04, with an annualized covariance of -227.0 %².

Out of 10 assets tracked against CBL, NHTC lands near the bottom at #8. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months CBL outperformed by 141.4 percentage points (+85.2% for CBL against -56.2% for NHTC). Risk is not evenly split, since NHTC carries 1.5 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CBL vs NHTC: side by side

CBL (CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.)NHTC (Natural Health Trends Corp.)
1-year return+85.2%-56.2%
5-year return+159.7%-50.8%
Volatility (ann.)26.3%40.5%
Beta vs S&P 5000.660.59
Max drawdown (3Y)-29.1%-71.7%
Market cap$1.7B
P/E (trailing)7.9
Dividend yield3.27%35.09%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: NHTC 35.09% vs 3.27%Smaller drawdown: CBL -29.1% vs -71.7%Higher 5y return: CBL +159.7% vs -50.8%
-62%0%+94%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CBL · NHTC

Year-by-year returns

YearCBLNHTC
2022-18.0%-42.1%
2023+13.0%+96.2%
2024+28.5%-11.5%
2025+37.2%-20.5%
2026+52.8%-41.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CBL and NHTC good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.21 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CBL and NHTC?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.21 over 3 years, with -0.38 over the last year and -0.04 over 5 years.

Is NHTC a good diversifier for CBL?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.21 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cbl-vs-nhtc.json

CBL vs NHTC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.21CBL vs NHTC-0.21

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CBL vs NHTC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cbl-vs-nhtc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cbl-vs-nhtc/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CBL correlations · NHTC correlations