PairBook
HomeCARE › CARE vs RDGT

CARE vs RDGT: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Carter Bankshares, Inc. (CARE) and Ridgetech, Inc. (RDGT) carry a correlation of -0.17, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.17
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.42
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.10
long-run
Ann. covariance
-619.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CARE and RDGT?

On 3 years of weekly data the CARE/RDGT correlation comes out at -0.17, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.42) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.17). The 5-year figure is -0.10, and annualized covariance runs at -619.2 %².

RDGT is close to the least connected end of CARE's tracked universe, ranking #12 of 14. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months CARE outperformed by 165.2 percentage points (+65.7% for CARE against -99.5% for RDGT). Risk is not evenly split, since RDGT carries 3.9 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CARE vs RDGT: side by side

CARE (Carter Bankshares, Inc.)RDGT (Ridgetech, Inc.)
1-year return+65.7%-99.5%
5-year return+167.6%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)30.7%120.7%
Beta vs S&P 5000.640.28
Max drawdown (3Y)-31.7%-99.9%
Market cap$0.7B
P/E (trailing)5.5
Dividend yield0.32%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: CARE 0.32% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: CARE -31.7% vs -99.9%Higher 5y return: CARE +167.6% vs -100.0%
-100%0%+212%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CARE · RDGT

Year-by-year returns

YearCARERDGT
2022+7.8%-21.5%
2023-9.8%-93.9%
2024+17.5%-59.8%
2025+11.8%+61.0%
2026+64.1%-99.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CARE and RDGT good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.17, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CARE and RDGT?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.17 over 3 years, with -0.42 over the last year and -0.10 over 5 years.

Is RDGT a good diversifier for CARE?

Yes: at -0.17, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.17 mean?

A reading of -0.17 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/care-vs-rdgt.json

CARE vs RDGT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.17CARE vs RDGT-0.17

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CARE vs RDGT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/care-vs-rdgt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/care-vs-rdgt/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CARE correlations · RDGT correlations