PairBook
HomeCAH › CAH vs RBBN

CAH vs RBBN: Correlation

Cardinal Health (CAH) and Ribbon Communications Inc. (RBBN) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.22.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.32
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.08
long-run
Ann. covariance
-267.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CAH and RBBN?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CAH and RBBN correlate at -0.22, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.32 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.08, with an annualized covariance of -267.3 %².

By 3-year correlation, RBBN places #25 of the 32 assets tracked against CAH. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with CAH ahead by 109.1 points (+59.2% versus -49.9%). One caveat on sizing: RBBN is 2.1 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CAH vs RBBN: side by side

CAH (Cardinal Health)RBBN (Ribbon Communications Inc.)
1-year return+59.2%-49.9%
5-year return+409.0%-69.7%
Volatility (ann.)24.2%50.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.311.67
Max drawdown (3Y)-20.4%-62.1%
Market cap$54.7B$0.4B
P/E (trailing)33.025.0
Dividend yield0.86%0.00%
Sector / categoryHealth CareUS Listed
Lower P/E: RBBN 25.0 vs 33.0Higher yield: CAH 0.86% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: CAH -20.4% vs -62.1%Higher 5y return: CAH +409.0% vs -69.7%
-51%0%+61%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CAH · RBBN

Year-by-year returns

YearCAHRBBN
2022+54.1%-53.9%
2023+34.1%+3.9%
2024+19.0%+43.4%
2025+76.3%-30.8%
2026+15.2%-30.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CAH and RBBN good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.22, CAH and RBBN have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CAH and RBBN?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CAH and RBBN is -0.22 over 3 years, -0.32 over 1 year and -0.08 over 5 years.

Is RBBN a good diversifier for CAH?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.22, CAH and RBBN have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cah-vs-rbbn.json

CAH vs RBBN: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22CAH vs RBBN-0.22

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CAH vs RBBN correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cah-vs-rbbn.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cah-vs-rbbn/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CAH correlations · RBBN correlations