PairBook
HomeCAG › CAG vs T

CAG vs T: Correlation

How closely do ConAgra Brands, Inc. (CAG) and AT&T (T) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.38, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.38
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.47
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.34
long-run
Ann. covariance
204.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CAG and T?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CAG and T correlate at 0.38, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.47 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.34, with an annualized covariance of 204.6 %².

By 3-year correlation, T places #16 of the 34 assets tracked against CAG. Twelve-month performance is nearly a tie, at -9.8% for CAG and -8.4% for T.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CAG vs T: side by side

CAG (ConAgra Brands, Inc.)T (AT&T)
1-year return-9.8%-8.4%
5-year return-36.6%+67.2%
Volatility (ann.)24.2%22.4%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.050.05
Max drawdown (3Y)-56.7%-28.9%
Market cap$7.7B$174.3B
P/E (trailing)8.4
Dividend yield8.65%4.29%
Sector / categoryUS ListedCommunication Services
Higher yield: CAG 8.65% vs 4.29%Smaller drawdown: T -28.9% vs -56.7%Higher 5y return: T +67.2% vs -36.6%
-28%0%+7%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CAG · T

Year-by-year returns

YearCAGT
2022+17.5%+6.5%
2023-22.8%-2.7%
2024+1.5%+44.1%
2025-33.3%+14.0%
2026-2.1%+6.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CAG and T good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.38 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CAG and T?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CAG and T is 0.38 over 3 years, 0.47 over 1 year and 0.34 over 5 years.

Is T a good diversifier for CAG?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.38 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.38 mean?

A reading of 0.38 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cag-vs-t.json

CAG vs T: 3-year weekly correlation 0.38CAG vs T0.38

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CAG vs T correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cag-vs-t.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cag-vs-t/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CAG correlations · T correlations