PairBook
HomeCAG › CAG vs FTFT

CAG vs FTFT: Correlation

How closely do ConAgra Brands, Inc. (CAG) and Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.22, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.19
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.14
long-run
Ann. covariance
-815.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CAG and FTFT?

On 3 years of weekly data the CAG/FTFT correlation comes out at -0.22, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.19) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.14, and annualized covariance runs at -815.3 %².

By 3-year correlation, FTFT places #28 of the 34 assets tracked against CAG. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with CAG ahead by 88.6 points (-9.8% versus -98.4%). Note the risk asymmetry: FTFT runs 6.4 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CAG vs FTFT: side by side

CAG (ConAgra Brands, Inc.)FTFT (Future FinTech Group Inc.)
1-year return-9.8%-98.4%
5-year return-36.6%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)24.2%154.7%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.050.87
Max drawdown (3Y)-56.7%-99.8%
Market cap$7.7B
P/E (trailing)0.0
Dividend yield8.65%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: CAG 8.65% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: CAG -56.7% vs -99.8%Higher 5y return: CAG -36.6% vs -100.0%
-98%0%+42%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CAG · FTFT

Year-by-year returns

YearCAGFTFT
2022+17.5%-72.2%
2023-22.8%-1.1%
2024+1.5%-83.1%
2025-33.3%-75.2%
2026-2.1%-95.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CAG and FTFT good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CAG and FTFT?

The CAG/FTFT correlation stands at -0.22 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.19, 5 years: -0.14), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is FTFT a good diversifier for CAG?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.22 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cag-vs-ftft.json

CAG vs FTFT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22CAG vs FTFT-0.22

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CAG vs FTFT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cag-vs-ftft.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cag-vs-ftft/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CAG correlations · FTFT correlations