CACI vs GD: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, CACI International, Inc. (CACI) and General Dynamics (GD) carry a correlation of 0.49, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CACI and GD?
On 3 years of weekly data the CACI/GD correlation comes out at 0.49, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.51 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.53, and annualized covariance runs at 367.9 %².
Among the 16 assets we track against CACI, GD ranks #7 by 3-year correlation. The trailing year gives CACI the advantage: +30.1% versus +18.8%, a 11.3-point spread. One caveat on sizing: CACI is 1.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CACI vs GD: side by side
| CACI (CACI International, Inc.) | GD (General Dynamics) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +30.1% | +18.8% |
| 5-year return | +146.9% | +111.9% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 35.3% | 21.1% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.56 | 0.52 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -42.9% | -22.5% |
| Market cap | $14.0B | $102.8B |
| P/E (trailing) | 25.8 | 23.3 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.62% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Industrials |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CACI | GD |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +11.7% | +21.7% |
| 2023 | +7.7% | +7.1% |
| 2024 | +24.8% | +3.5% |
| 2025 | +31.9% | +30.4% |
| 2026 | +19.0% | +14.4% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CACI and GD good diversifiers for each other?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.49 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CACI and GD?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.49 over 3 years, with 0.51 over the last year and 0.53 over 5 years.
Is GD a good diversifier for CACI?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.49 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.49 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/caci-vs-gd.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/caci-vs-gd/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CACI correlations · GD correlations
