PairBook
HomeC › C vs SYF

C vs SYF: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Citigroup (C) and Synchrony Financial (SYF) carry a correlation of 0.74, a strong link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.74
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.68
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.73
long-run
Ann. covariance
706.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are C and SYF?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of C and SYF correlate at 0.74, strong. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.68) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.73, with an annualized covariance of 706.4 %².

Within C's tracked universe of 33 assets, SYF comes in at #9 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months C outperformed by 32.6 percentage points (+39.9% for C against +7.3% for SYF). The rolling one-year correlation moved between 0.58 and 0.85 over the past three years, a moderate range.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
How the one-year correlation itself moved over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

C vs SYF: side by side

C (Citigroup)SYF (Synchrony Financial)
1-year return+39.9%+7.3%
5-year return+119.6%+81.0%
Volatility (ann.)30.3%31.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.391.28
Max drawdown (3Y)-31.3%-37.7%
Market cap$222.6B$26.0B
P/E (trailing)14.48.2
Dividend yield1.80%1.50%
Sector / categoryFinancialsFinancials
Lower P/E: SYF 8.2 vs 14.4Higher yield: C 1.80% vs 1.50%Smaller drawdown: C -31.3% vs -37.7%Higher 5y return: C +119.6% vs +81.0%
-15%0%+52%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. C · SYF

Year-by-year returns

YearCSYF
2022-22.1%-27.4%
2023+19.0%+19.8%
2024+41.9%+74.0%
2025+70.4%+30.6%
2026+15.4%-3.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are C and SYF good diversifiers for each other?

Somewhat, no more. With 0.74 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.

FAQ

What is the correlation between C and SYF?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between C and SYF is 0.74 over 3 years, 0.68 over 1 year and 0.73 over 5 years.

Is SYF a good diversifier for C?

Somewhat, no more. With 0.74 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.

What does a correlation of 0.74 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.74 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/c-vs-syf.json

C vs SYF: 3-year weekly correlation 0.74C vs SYF0.74

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![C vs SYF correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/c-vs-syf.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/c-vs-syf/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: C correlations · SYF correlations