PairBook
HomeC › C vs LITE

C vs LITE: Correlation

How closely do Citigroup (C) and Lumentum (LITE) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.55, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.55
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.47
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.45
long-run
Ann. covariance
1098.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are C and LITE?

On 3 years of weekly data the C/LITE correlation comes out at 0.55, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.47 over 1 year against 0.55 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.45, and annualized covariance runs at 1098.0 %².

Among the 33 assets we track against C, LITE ranks #22 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with LITE ahead by 619.9 points (+39.9% versus +659.8%). This link changes with the market regime, having swung between 0.04 and 0.73 on a rolling one-year basis. One caveat on sizing: LITE is 2.2 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
One-year correlation, rolled weekly across the last three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

C vs LITE: side by side

C (Citigroup)LITE (Lumentum)
1-year return+39.9%+659.8%
5-year return+119.6%+998.1%
Volatility (ann.)30.3%65.5%
Beta vs S&P 5001.392.36
Max drawdown (3Y)-31.3%-50.6%
Market cap$222.6B$85.8B
P/E (trailing)14.4
Dividend yield1.80%0.00%
Sector / categoryFinancialsInformation Technology
Higher yield: C 1.80% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: C -31.3% vs -50.6%Higher 5y return: LITE +998.1% vs +119.6%
-2%0%+550%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. C · LITE

Year-by-year returns

YearCLITE
2022-22.1%-50.7%
2023+19.0%+0.5%
2024+41.9%+60.1%
2025+70.4%+339.1%
2026+15.4%+159.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are C and LITE good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.55 means C and LITE share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between C and LITE?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.55 over 3 years, with 0.47 over the last year and 0.45 over 5 years.

Is LITE a good diversifier for C?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.55 means C and LITE share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.55 mean?

A reading of 0.55 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/c-vs-lite.json

C vs LITE: 3-year weekly correlation 0.55C vs LITE0.55

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![C vs LITE correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/c-vs-lite.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/c-vs-lite/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: C correlations · LITE correlations