PairBook
HomeC › C vs JDZG

C vs JDZG: Correlation

How closely do Citigroup (C) and JIADE LIMITED - Class A (JDZG) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.19, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.19
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.38
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1516.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are C and JDZG?

On 3 years of weekly data the C/JDZG correlation comes out at -0.19, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.38) than the 3-year average (-0.19). The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -1516.9 %².

Among the 33 assets we track against C, JDZG ranks #28 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with C ahead by 139.2 points (+39.9% versus -99.3%). Note the risk asymmetry: JDZG runs 8.3 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

C vs JDZG: side by side

C (Citigroup)JDZG (JIADE LIMITED - Class A)
1-year return+39.9%-99.3%
5-year return+119.6%n/a
Volatility (ann.)30.3%252.5%
Beta vs S&P 5001.390.21
Max drawdown (3Y)-31.3%-100.0%
Market cap$222.6B
P/E (trailing)14.4
Dividend yield1.80%0.00%
Sector / categoryFinancialsUS Listed
Higher yield: C 1.80% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: C -31.3% vs -100.0%
-99%0%+116%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. C · JDZG

Year-by-year returns

YearCJDZG
2022-22.1%
2023+19.0%
2024+41.9%
2025+70.4%-88.0%
2026+15.4%-98.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are C and JDZG good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.19, C and JDZG have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between C and JDZG?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.19 over 3 years, with -0.38 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.

Is JDZG a good diversifier for C?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.19, C and JDZG have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?

A reading of -0.19 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/c-vs-jdzg.json

C vs JDZG: 3-year weekly correlation -0.19C vs JDZG-0.19

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![C vs JDZG correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/c-vs-jdzg.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/c-vs-jdzg/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: C correlations · JDZG correlations