PairBook
HomeC › C vs FNB

C vs FNB: Correlation

How closely do Citigroup (C) and F.N.B. Corporation (FNB) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.73, which is strong.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.73
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.63
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.68
long-run
Ann. covariance
607.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are C and FNB?

Over the past 3 years, C and FNB moved with a correlation of 0.73, which is strong. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.63) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.68, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 607.0 %².

By 3-year correlation, FNB places #12 of the 33 assets tracked against C. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months C outperformed by 26.5 percentage points (+39.9% for C against +13.4% for FNB).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

C vs FNB: side by side

C (Citigroup)FNB (F.N.B. Corporation)
1-year return+39.9%+13.4%
5-year return+119.6%+91.1%
Volatility (ann.)30.3%27.4%
Beta vs S&P 5001.391.03
Max drawdown (3Y)-31.3%-32.6%
Market cap$222.6B$6.6B
P/E (trailing)14.411.0
Dividend yield1.80%2.65%
Sector / categoryFinancialsUS Listed
Lower P/E: FNB 11.0 vs 14.4Higher yield: FNB 2.65% vs 1.80%Smaller drawdown: C -31.3% vs -32.6%Higher 5y return: C +119.6% vs +91.1%
-8%0%+52%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. C · FNB

Year-by-year returns

YearCFNB
2022-22.1%+11.7%
2023+19.0%+9.8%
2024+41.9%+11.0%
2025+70.4%+19.4%
2026+15.4%+9.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are C and FNB good diversifiers for each other?

Somewhat, no more. With 0.73 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.

FAQ

What is the correlation between C and FNB?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.73 over 3 years, with 0.63 over the last year and 0.68 over 5 years.

Is FNB a good diversifier for C?

Somewhat, no more. With 0.73 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.

What does a correlation of 0.73 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.73 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/c-vs-fnb.json

C vs FNB: 3-year weekly correlation 0.73C vs FNB0.73

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![C vs FNB correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/c-vs-fnb.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/c-vs-fnb/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: C correlations · FNB correlations